
I wrote this article for the latest issue of CPU Magazine, it's about the recent announement that Intel is jumping in to the solid state hard drive business.
I have been writing quite a bit about Intel lately, often about the company’s quest to increase its platform real estate from within a personal computer. Last month I touched a bit on Intel’s much-anticipated Larrabee graphics platform; this month I’m writing about the chipmaker’s solid-state drives. Unless you’re living in a Unabomber shack somewhere in the deep woods, you probably heard that Intel announced its new SSDs at IDF this year.
Let me start by saying that I have a pair of these babies running in my Blackbird PC in RAID 0. Based on my experience, Intel has completely changed the game with these drives. Not only has the company made SSD relevant in high-performance scenarios, but through some complex algorithm management, Intel has managed to wipe the floor with any other storage technology on the planet.
Of course performance is important, but what about battery life and drive efficiency for notebook applications? Months ago, Tom’s Hardware wrote about the SSD battery life issue. They missed a few points, one of the most notable being that there is a direct correlation between the efficiency and performance of the drive and the overall battery life on the device. In other words, the slower the SSD, the longer it takes to run a task, thus the more battery life it eats. This is not the case with Intel drives; they are fast, efficient, and they actually extend the battery life of the machine compared to other SSDs. After installing a pair of them drives in RAID, my system literally boots Windows Vista Ultimate in seconds. Overall, I would say these new SSD drives rock, both in notebook applications and in desktops.
You might wonder what this means for Intel, and you wouldn’t be alone. My guess is the company is working to increase its aforementioned platform real estate through technologies like NAND, SSD, chipsets, CPUs, wireless, and soon through graphics. Imagine if Intel can pull off the seemingly impossible by making its next-generation graphics much better the previous Intel Extreme graphics. I’m not speaking from insider information here; I’m simply guessing that Intel has some incredible things in the back room at the moment, based in part on rumors that the company is apparently hiring some of the best graphics engineers in the industry. I can only imagine what the new Centrino will be like; after all, if the company can suddenly jump into the storage business with an industry-leading product, then anything is possible.
The industry is changing. The days where customers would spend thousands of dollars on a huge, 2-kilowatt, multi-GPU desktop PC just to play one game well are almost gone. People are generally very well-informed in making buying decisions, and they’re looking for “greener,” more efficient PCs. They want a system that works and supports all of their applications.
So, what’s the point?
If Intel can pull off creating the ultimate integrated graphics part, it will likely make third-party discrete graphics irrelevant in notebooks. Why would anyone want to integrate a third-party discrete chipset when all you need is an Intel processor combined with whatever Centrino-branded devices you need to create a hardware simple platform? Now throw in the Intel SSD and you have a bigger, even uglier Intel than you do today.
As a builder of systems, I’ve learned that the success in this industry isn’t as simple as taking the best components and tossing them into a box. The secret is to look at what companies like Intel are doing, listen to what your customers are looking for, and work backward into cool, innovative new products. As such, we spend a lot of time imagining ways to create thinner, lighter, less expensive, and more powerful devices. Yeah, it’s a continuing process, and Intel seems to be leading the way, again.
Let me start by saying that I have a pair of these babies running in my Blackbird PC in RAID 0. Based on my experience, Intel has completely changed the game with these drives. Not only has the company made SSD relevant in high-performance scenarios, but through some complex algorithm management, Intel has managed to wipe the floor with any other storage technology on the planet.
Of course performance is important, but what about battery life and drive efficiency for notebook applications? Months ago, Tom’s Hardware wrote about the SSD battery life issue. They missed a few points, one of the most notable being that there is a direct correlation between the efficiency and performance of the drive and the overall battery life on the device. In other words, the slower the SSD, the longer it takes to run a task, thus the more battery life it eats. This is not the case with Intel drives; they are fast, efficient, and they actually extend the battery life of the machine compared to other SSDs. After installing a pair of them drives in RAID, my system literally boots Windows Vista Ultimate in seconds. Overall, I would say these new SSD drives rock, both in notebook applications and in desktops.
You might wonder what this means for Intel, and you wouldn’t be alone. My guess is the company is working to increase its aforementioned platform real estate through technologies like NAND, SSD, chipsets, CPUs, wireless, and soon through graphics. Imagine if Intel can pull off the seemingly impossible by making its next-generation graphics much better the previous Intel Extreme graphics. I’m not speaking from insider information here; I’m simply guessing that Intel has some incredible things in the back room at the moment, based in part on rumors that the company is apparently hiring some of the best graphics engineers in the industry. I can only imagine what the new Centrino will be like; after all, if the company can suddenly jump into the storage business with an industry-leading product, then anything is possible.
The industry is changing. The days where customers would spend thousands of dollars on a huge, 2-kilowatt, multi-GPU desktop PC just to play one game well are almost gone. People are generally very well-informed in making buying decisions, and they’re looking for “greener,” more efficient PCs. They want a system that works and supports all of their applications.
So, what’s the point?
If Intel can pull off creating the ultimate integrated graphics part, it will likely make third-party discrete graphics irrelevant in notebooks. Why would anyone want to integrate a third-party discrete chipset when all you need is an Intel processor combined with whatever Centrino-branded devices you need to create a hardware simple platform? Now throw in the Intel SSD and you have a bigger, even uglier Intel than you do today.
As a builder of systems, I’ve learned that the success in this industry isn’t as simple as taking the best components and tossing them into a box. The secret is to look at what companies like Intel are doing, listen to what your customers are looking for, and work backward into cool, innovative new products. As such, we spend a lot of time imagining ways to create thinner, lighter, less expensive, and more powerful devices. Yeah, it’s a continuing process, and Intel seems to be leading the way, again.
13 blogger comments:
Intel does seem very aware of what people are expecting, and what they'd love to see. They need to be, because there are a lot of people lately, Via, Nvidia, AMD, who seem to be more willing to challenge Intel's new technology, and promote their own as superior.
Maybe I am missing the point here, but if Intel's Discrete graphics can't run a decent game of Tetris, (never mind a modern game) why would anyone want one? Intel has a LONG way to go before it actually has a good graphics solution, but OTOH, if all your doing is office and surfing the net with your laptop, by all means an Intel chipset is the way to go, but I think you are underestimating your consumers if you think that all they want laptops for is to surf and do e-mail.
LRB: 2009, 1.5x the competition
you got me
LBR 2009? Little river Band? not sure what you are referring to. a quick google search shows LBR 2009 + little River Band 2009.
Now if you are stating sales, than, yes,Intel leads the sales, because 90% of the public has no Idea what they are buying,and just pick up the $500 special at the local Best Buy then come to a person like me wondering why they can't run WOW on their new laptop.
LRB = Larrabee. You know, a major talking point in the blog posting that you are commenting on. It is Intel's graphics platform due for release in 2009 and not the current integrated graphics solutions that you assumed Rahul was talking about. If you don't know this, maybe you shouldn't own a computer company.
Yes, I do Know about Larrabee, just have never seen anyone abbreviate it like that (apparently Google and the rest of the world agrees with me). But so far it is just specifications on a proposed document. The hardware doesn't exist yet, with Intel's current and past track record to produce a even half decent graphics card, the point is rather moot.Just more vapourware. Intel has been trying to sell us a "killer" graphics for years (remember the infamous i740 "killer" solution). The sad fact, is that Intel has had over 20 years to come up with even a good "mid-range" card and has failed miserably at that. Intel has the "budget" market wrapped up and that is where they should be staying. We have seen the empty promise of a "great" graphics card for years from Intel and for over 20 years the have fail to produce anything noteworthy. This is all just marketing "FUD" from Intel.
But we are drifting away from Rahul's major point of his blog, The SSD. I myself, can't see any benefit of an SSD drive for now, until the compacity goes up and the price goes down. Owning an Asus EECPC with a 4 gig drive was just plain useless when I could get micro SD cards with 4 and 8 gig compacity for dirt cheap to expand the system. When the price of a 500 gig SSD is the same or less then a current 500 HD, then it is time to seriously take a look at them. Boot times and such really don't make that much of a difference in an OS unless you are running Vista. XP makes really no difference. As a regular consumer, it is still way too early to make a good judgment call on the SSD drives. As a system builder (just a low end {CHEAP}builder), there is no demand or public inquiry on SSD drives yet. That will change. In a year from now, it might be a whole different ball game.
I would never buy a computer from someone who says "compacity."
I don't know how practical this will be for gaming but could be great for small business accounting.
Quickbooks keeps past years data in the same file as current. This works out great for searching history, but does slow things down. Updating to the new version takes forever, and reporting could be faster on large files.
Hello Rahul! I just chanced upon your blog and I am so excited about the Voodoo Envy 133.. The only problem is that Voodoo does not ship to my country(Singapore) or anywhere in Asia for that matter. I believe there is a huge demand for high end notebooks in the region like the envy 133 and would be happy to purchase one of your fine machines if only I could. Do you have any plans on expanding Voodoo's brand name into the region anytime soon? Or do I have to fly the the US to get my hands on the envy?
best regards
ALexander
What is this? Rumors say that HP is shutting down VoodooPC? Is it true?
http://techgage.com/news/hp_rumored_to_be_closing_voodoopc/
I cant believe the dude who used the word 'compacity' does not think that SSD drives make a difference! And to be fair I have not used an SSD before but if you just think about it, if your hard drive is very fast, all apps will automatically pick up speed regardless of OS would it not? Boot speed is very important, system hibernate and coming out of hibernate is very important. Let's see all the people who are editing HD footage, for them SSDs will be a boon to use as a scratch disk. For gamers, faster loading of levels, etc etc I just can't believe its not going to help!
I do agree the price needs to drop but if you follow the market that process has already started and is well underway :) I for one look forward to high capacity SSD drives for my computers at home and for work!
Cheers!
Rahul,
Which blog will you be posting to more? This or "the next bench?" Or will you be posting the same content to both?
The figureheads of the graphics industry will not soon be put out in the cold by this new graphics technology, however I can see it becoming a competitor, especially in price.
My favorite part of what you wrote is regarding the SSDs. The biggest point of failure in any PC is the moving parts, and in my experience HDDs are one of the biggest failure points. Solid state effectively eliminates that point of failure, which is really great for computer-based business.
I also agree about green technology. I myself am a big advocate of green power supplies, which only draw as much power as the computer needs. It is so wasteful to have a 500watt power supply when the computer only really uses 400watts.
How do you feel about the gaming cafe industry? Are we just laying in wait for someone to come a long and do that business model right? I really think that gaming will become more prevalent in our society in the future, and that whoever finally makes the business work, will be the driving force in both hardware and software technology for gamers. Any thoughts?
Post a Comment